/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

/pol/ - The politics board

Posting Mode: Reply Return

Max message length: 4096


(used to delete files and postings)


  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 2
  • Max file size: 70.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.

01/8/20 Zoomerchan discord: https://discord.gg/bNyqNXE
05/5/20 The Zoomerchan update has finally arrived!.

[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(261.21 KB 768x600 REPUBLICANS2.png)
Zoomzer 07/28/2020 (Tue) 16:17:20 No. 263
Imagine wanting to remove the British Monarchy :|
(171.62 KB 1280x720 tsar.jpg)
imagine being a bootlicker
(101.33 KB 1024x679 antifa van.jpg)
>>264 imagine being a commie
(45.34 KB 1275x803 pepe.png)
>>264 >Tfw your ideology leads you to take pride in the murder of children pretty cringe
>>265 >imagine being a commie alright, I'm there >>266 you mean like how a nazi division murdered 500 children in a daycare in 1944?
>>268 I'm not a Nazi, nor do I support modern national socialist movements. I am however, in support of a strong monarchy, with enlightenment values, and a healthy respect for the human spirit. I will agree with communists and socialists though, in the regard that American capitalism is garbage.
(1.16 MB 332x390 okbootlicker.gif)
>>269 Monarchism is simply one particular organization of class dictatorship well suited for many pre-capitalist modes of production. Legal sovereignty resides in a family line, one of many potential legal forms of the dictatorship of a ruling class. Monarchists are loud and clear that they don’t stand for and don’t care for liberty. Most monarkiddies I see online are pretty much dissilusioned ancaps that read too much Hoppe and believe that a monarch ensures the outermost liberty and non-interventionism of the state, citing the economic models of the 19th century in which European monarchs would have a completely hands-off approach in regards to the economy (while "only" politically repressing liberal republicans and socialists). The difference between monarchism and fascism is meaningless in the real world.
>>268 1) that didn't happen nerd 2) if it did, we wouldn't be taking pride in it
(695.38 KB 1083x1077 gniew.png)
(110.55 KB 700x918 1914_1_Germania_w.jpg)
>>270 Out of the top 10 countries listed in the democracy index, 7 of them are monarchies. In the top 10 countries listed by human development 4 are monarchies. Constitutional monarchy with a 50/50 split between parliament and monarch is the best form of governance.
>>271 >implying wignats don't take pride in the holocaust
>>278 Most of those monarchies you mention don't even have a 50/50 split. Usually it seems like the monarch cut ribbons at supermarket opening ceremonies or ring in the national holiday while the princes function as like tabloid celebrities with cushy jobs on the FIFA board of directors. Monarchies are shit and breed nonces. You're definitely a burger, if not then you would know royals are only good at pedophilia and having incest related major illnesses. Monarchism is an incredible detriment to the economies of the UK and former colonies. People all over the world are paying taxes, and part of those taxes is literally to just keep their royal family to keep them alive and living in absolute luxury. Do us all a favor and shut the fuck up about their removal being detrimental. They are parasites who offer nothing. >>271 >That didn't happen, and if it did, it wasn't that bad Straight out of the narcissist's playbook. It makes sense, considering Hitler’s narcissistic leader traits played a role in persuading his followers to convert to nazism. The narcissistic behaviors of Nazis impacted the social life of the German society through changing the structure of the society and making it racial nationalism. Read "A Psycho-Historical Analysis of Adolf Hitler: The Role of Personality, Psychopathology and Development". >After the door of the building was blown off we saw a daycare-full of small children, around 500; all with small hands in the air. Even Dirlewanger's own people called him a butcher; he ordered to kill them all. The shots were fired, but he requested his men to save the ammo and finish them off with rifle-butts and bayonets. Blood and brain matter flowed in streams down the stairs. http://www.warsawuprising.com/witness/schenk.htm It sure did happen, asshole. Schenk's memoirs are historically accurate and valuable. >>279 This is why fascists will never be taken seriously by anyone. Fascism is an infantile mental disorder.
>>280 I'm not an American. I come from the United Kingdom myself. 80% of the country supports the continued existence of the monarchy. In the country I now reside, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the support for the monarchy is 78% While these are not perfect monarchies, and don't follow a 50/50 split, they serve as great examples. Certainly better than any modern communist nation, excluding the Zapatistas, and China which is no more communist than Japan.
>>279 They don't. The only cases where I've seen it happen was in response to the Bomber Harris memes
>>280 >blah blah blah hitler narcissist he was also a gay transgender jew black and whatnot, please read moishe's "pseudo-psychology analysis of bad scary man" it is totally not biased and based on war propaganda Did I say if it did happen it wasnt that bad? No. I said we wouldnt be taking pride in it, because it would be horrible. The same reason why we aren't monsters who say stuff like "SS-Oberfuhrer Dirlewagner do it again", Albert Kesselring do it again", or "SS-Obersturmbannfuhrer Eichmann do it again"(for natsocs who unironically believe the holocaust happened, despite the evidence) unlike some fine people i know who think it's fine to joke and laugh about civilians being burnt for no reason >Dirlewagner's atrocities during the warsaw uprising proves that 6 trillion people were gassed using pesticides in a small room fuck off
>>283 Anon you're a complete faggot lmao
>>284 great argument nerd
>>285 very perceptive, retard. we're not arguing with you, we're laughing at you. no need to waste time arguing with ahistorical retards
>>285 >DeathtoIsrael Lmao
>>292 >gets btfod >"w-we're not arguing we're laughing >we cope harder loser
>>293 You think Israel deserves to exist?
>>294 Anon, there's as much evidence of German war crimes as there is evidence of American, and British war crimes. Don't deny it, makes you look like a retard.
>>304 i never denied the german warcrimes
Groom of the stool? Absolutely degenerate https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ha2yvy4RbTY


no cookies?